Public Perception and Physician Engagement: A Tale of Two Medicines
- IMCI Pharmaceuticals
- Apr 25
- 2 min read
While medical cannabis is gaining regulatory approval and patient demand is rising, its full integration into healthcare still faces a significant obstacle: perception. In both Europe and Israel, the public and the medical community are still grappling with the role of cannabis in medicine and how it compares to traditional pharmaceuticals.

Pharmaceuticals: Trusted, Proven, Prescribed
Traditional medications benefit from decades of institutional trust. They are:
Developed through clinical trials
Approved by national health authorities
Reimbursed by insurance
Backed by education and training for physicians
As a result, both patients and doctors are generally comfortable with prescribing and using conventional drugs. They are seen as scientific, safe, and reliable.
Medical Cannabis: Rising Use, Lingering Stigma
Despite legalization and medical availability, cannabis still carries social and professional baggage, rooted in its history as a recreational and often illicit substance.
🇮🇱 Israel: A Public Leader, A Conservative Profession
Israel is a global pioneer in medical cannabis R&D, and public acceptance is relatively high.
However, many doctors remain cautious: they hesitate to prescribe cannabis due to:
Lack of formal clinical data
Fear of reputational risk
Limited training in cannabis therapeutics
To prescribe cannabis, Israeli physicians must undergo special certification, creating a barrier to mainstream adoption.
🇪🇺 Europe: Cautious Medical Adoption
In countries like Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK, public support for cannabis has grown, especially among patients seeking relief from chronic pain, anxiety, and neurological conditions.
Still, many doctors remain skeptical or unfamiliar with cannabis as a legitimate treatment.
This is partly due to the lack of standardized guidelines, inconsistent product availability, and ongoing regulatory ambiguity.
The Patient-Doctor Disconnect
In many cases, patients are leading the change, not physicians. Patients often:
Hear anecdotal success stories
Turn to online communities for guidance
Seek cannabis when other treatments fail
Meanwhile, doctors may feel ill-equipped to respond. Without official training, clear protocols, or robust evidence, many prefer to stick with conventional medications, even when patients ask for alternatives.
Shifting the Narrative: Education and Evidence
To close the gap between perception and practice, the industry must focus on:
Medical education: including cannabis in formal training and continuing education programs
Public health campaigns: separating medical cannabis from recreational use in the public eye
Clinical data: funding high-quality research that gives physicians confidence
In Israel, efforts are underway to expand physician training and integrate cannabis into more specialties. Similar steps are being taken in Europe — though progress varies by country.
Looking Ahead
As public acceptance of medical cannabis continues to rise, physician engagement is the next frontier. Without it, cannabis risks remaining a niche treatment, one supported by patients but sidelined by healthcare systems.
To fully integrate cannabis into modern medicine, trust, training, and scientific credibility must go hand in hand.

Comments